A working preview of what 4C's revenue infrastructure could look like — already trained on what's publicly known, ready for you to test, break, and hand to Kevin and Denny. Imagine what we could do with the full picture from inside the business.
Before we build anything, you need to know we heard you.
The KPI. Everything in this proposal is engineered to that number. We commit to a guaranteed floor by month 4. Section 07.
The thesis. Your offering closes itself in the room. Our entire job is the part before the room — qualification, routing, booking, showing up first.
The buyer. Not wildfire homeowners — though they qualify. The engine is tuned for developer / track-builder / specifying-architect / GC volume.
The urgency. 70 houses/month of factory throughput is sitting idle for lack of demand. Every week without flow is a week of fixed cost burning.
We believe the best way to evaluate revenue infrastructure is to use it. So we built you a preview of both agents using publicly available information about 4C — the SAFE and ECO systems, panel sizing, ICC-ES listings, the Gensler relationship, your Hayward factory throughput, and the four buyer archetypes you described in our call.
Hit them as a developer. Hit them as an architect. Hit them as a curious tire-kicker. Try to break them. Hand the phone number to Kevin and ask him to be hostile. This is what 4C's first line of revenue defense could look like at 2am on a Saturday — when a contractor in Altadena is finally researching panel systems.
These are demos, not production deployments. They've been built quickly with publicly available information about 4C — your website, LinkedIn, ICC-ES listings, public rebuild data. The accuracy and depth they show today is what we can do from outside the business. Imagine what's possible with the full technical picture from your team, your real product specs, your sales playbook, and conversations with Kevin and Denny.
Embedded on a 4C-trained preview site. Knows SAFE vs ECO, panel sizing, ICC-ES listings, Gensler, the LA Fire Rebuild Program. Qualifies against your four ICPs in plain conversation. Books the meeting if they're a fit. Sends a structured lead summary if they're not.
Same training. Same qualification logic. Triggered from inside the chat for prospects who'd rather talk than type — the agent calls them, holds the conversation, books the meeting on your calendar, sends the lead summary to your team by email.
Your current site (4ccs.com) is a beautifully shot brand statement. The build we'd propose extends it with a layer engineered specifically for revenue — every page becomes part of a funnel, every visitor is routed by their archetype, every conversation feeds the agents above. This is a directional preview, built to start a conversation about what's possible.
30-minute video call with Yonah and the engineering team.
Notice what the page does. Real photography of real product. Four routes for four buyers. Two systems on one platform with their actual cutaway diagrams. Project gallery as proof. Each visitor is routed in one click and the agent above takes over from there.
Two channels working in parallel. Inbound catches who's already looking. Outbound finds who'd buy if they knew you existed.
Once they land, the AI web agent qualifies them in conversation, not a form. Four-archetype routing. Inbound never gets dropped.
Most agencies drop a lead after one email. Construction buying cycles run 6+ months — we hold the prospect through the whole arc.
The agent books on Yonah's, Kevin's, or Denny's calendar based on archetype. Click to conversation in under 90 seconds.
You mentioned you're evaluating two paths. Both have integrity, and both work for the right kind of company. Below is how we see the choice — described honestly so you can decide what fits where 4C wants to go.
A senior person — typically with construction or industrial sales DNA — runs your GTM for a few hours a week. They set up your CRM, define your ICP, write your sequences, and either coach or staff a BDR seat. The relationship is human-led and human-paced. When the contract ends, the engagement ends.
We build you a permanent revenue infrastructure — website, AI web agent, AI voice agent, CRM setup, sequences, integrations — all configured for 4C, all yours. Then we run and improve it on a monthly retainer you can stop after the first six months.
The question isn't which path is better in the abstract — both have real merit. It's which fits 4C right now: the company you're building, the throughput you need to fill, and how you want your team's time spent.
You said it on the call: "scope, time, cost, outcome — all sit with the energy."
We've structured this as two decisions instead of three tiers, because that maps better to how this work actually unfolds — one decision is about owning the infrastructure, the other is about who runs and improves it month over month.
Decision 1 — The Build. A one-time investment in revenue infrastructure 4C keeps. Decision 2 — The Operate. A monthly retainer to keep improving and operating it. Two yeses, easier to commit to one at a time.
A one-time, fixed-price project. Built in 6–7 weeks. Yours from day one.
A monthly retainer. 6-month minimum, then month-to-month. Cancel anytime after.
This isn't performance pricing — you keep your full retainer fee, no contingency. It's a conviction signal. If we miss the floor in any month past month 4, we add an additional month of operate work to your engagement at no extra cost — capped at three free months in any 12-month period. We're confident the engine will hit your floor; this is how we put skin in the game without making outcomes the entire basis of the relationship.
Everything we build is yours to keep — the website, the AI web agent, the AI voice agent, the CRM setup, all of it. If you'd prefer to host and maintain it yourselves (or with another team), that's completely fine. If you'd rather we keep running the infrastructure — uptime, updates, monitoring, security, agent runtime — we offer three packages depending on what level of coverage 4C wants.
In your category, a single rebuild project sits between $500K and $2M+ in contract value. The slider defaults to $750K — a realistic LA single-family insurance-funded rebuild — but drag it up or down to match your actual mix.
Drag the sliders. Consider what the cost of doing nothing looks like — the projects Cover, Samara, and Plant Prefab close this year because they showed up for the search and 4C didn't.
BoxBuild is a revenue infrastructure partner for established construction companies — modular, panelized, mass timber, restoration, GCs. We're not a generalist agency that picked up a ConTech client. We've been embedded in this industry, building revenue infrastructure for it, since the start.
Our category-specific work is the reason the LinkedIn post that brought you to us existed. The thinking that produced that post produces this engine.
You said it yourself: a nicer saw and a forklift don't matter without people to move panels to. We've shown you what the engine could look like. The only decision left is whether 4C powers it on.
You're in. Reply to this and we send a contract within 24 hours. Kickoff next week. Engine live in 6–7. Floor of 5 ICP meetings/month by month 4 — backed by our Conviction Commitment.
No hard feelings. Tell us what was off — wrong scope, wrong number, wrong partner — and we'll close cleanly. If we can point you at someone better, we will.
Either answer is fine. What's not fine is silence. Your factory is making 70 houses a month of throughput against $1.2M of contracted revenue. Every week without a decision is a week of fixed cost burning against silent panels. 4C deserves a clear answer either way — and so does the team.